1.Adam, I.Y.I. 2017. Effect of deep-litter floor and battery cages system on the productive performance of commercial layers in Elobied, Sudan. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kordofan, Sudan.

2.Ahammed, M., Chae, B.J., Lohakare, J., Keohavong, B., Lee, M.H., Lee, S.J., Kim, D.M., Lee, J.Y. and Ohh, S.J. 2014. Comparison of aviary, barn and conventional cage raising of chickens on laying performance and egg quality. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 27(8): 1196-1203.

3.AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC, USA.

4.Appleby, M.C. 2003. The European Union ban on conventional cages for laying hens: History and prospects. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci., 6: 103-121.

5.BIS. Bureau of Indian Standards 2007. Poultry Feeds Specifications. (5th Revision), Manak Bhawan, 9, Bahadur Shah Jafar Marg, New Delhi, India.

6.Castellini, C., Perella, F., Mugnai, C. and Dal Bosco, A. 2006. Welfare, productivity and qualitative traits of egg in laying hens reared under different rearing systems. Poster at: XII European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy.

7.Cotta, T. 1997. Reprodução da galinha e produção de ovos. Lavras: UFLA-Faepe, 81-92.

8.Dikmen, B.Y, Ipek, A., Sahan, U., Petek, M. and Sozcu, A. 2016. Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range). Poult. Sci., 95(7): 1564-1572.

9.Dukic-Stojcic, M., Peric, L., Bjedov, S. and Milosevic, N. 2009. The quality of table eggs produced in different housing system. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb., 25(5-6): 1103-1108.

10.Elson, H.A. 1992. Evaluation of economic aspects of housing systems for layers. In Proceedings XIX World’s Poultry Congress, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2: 503-508.

11.Englmaierova, M., Tumova, E., Charvatova, V. and Skrivan, M. 2014. Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 59(8): 345-352.

12.Haugh, R.R. 1937. The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. U.S. Egg Poult. Magazine, 43: 552-555.

13.Huneau-Salaun, A., Guinebretiere, M., Taktak, A., Huonnic, D. and Michel, V. 2011. Furnished cages for laying hens: study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location, zootechnical performance and egg quality. Animal, 5(6): 911-917.

14.Jones, D.R., Karcher, D.M. and Abdo, Z. 2014. Effect of a commercial housing system on egg quality during extended storage. Poult. Sci., 93(5): 1282-1288.

15.Kucukyilmaz, K., Bozkurt, M., Herken, E.N., C?nar, M., Catl, A.U., Bintas, E. and Coven, F. 2012. Effects of rearing systems on performance, egg characteristics and immune response in two layer hen genotype. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 25(4): 559-568.

16.Leyendecker, M., Hamann, H., Hartung, J., Kamphues, J., Ring, C., Glunder, G., Ahlers, C., Sander, I., Neumann, U. and Distl, O. 2001a. Analysis of genotype–environment interactions between layer lines and housing systems for performance trails, egg quality and bone strength. 1st Communication: Performance traits. Zuchtungskunde, 73: 290-307.

17.Leyendecker, M., Hamann, H., Hartung, J., Kamphues, J., Ring, C., Glunder, G., Ahlers, C., Sander, I., Neumann, U. and Distl, O. 2001b. Analysis of genotype-environment interactions between layer lines and housing systems for performance trails, egg quality and bone strength. 2nd Communication: Egg quality traits. Zuchtungskunde, 73: 308-323.

18.Lichovnikova, M. and Zeman, L. 2008. Effect of housing system on the calcium requirement of laying hens and on eggshell quality. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 53: 162-168.

19.Mench, J.A., Sumner, D.A. and Rosen-Molina, J.T. 2011. Sustainability of egg production in the United States - The policy and market context. Poult. Sci., 90(1): 229-240.

20.Neijat, M., House, J.D., Guenter, W. and Kebreab, E. 2011. Production performance and nitrogen flow of Shaver White layers housed in enriched or conventional cage systems. Poult. Sci., 90(3): 543-554.

21.Patterson, P.H., Koelkebeck, K.W., Bell, D.D., Carey, J.B., Anderson, K.E. and Darre, M.J. 2001. Egg marketing in national supermarkets: Specialty eggs - part 2. Poult. Sci., 80(4): 390-395.

22.Petek, M., Cavusoglu, E., Topal, E., Unal, C., and Abdourhamane, I.M. 2015. Effects of slatted floor housing on animal welfare in broiler production. Proceedings of 3rd International Poultry Meat Congress, 22-26 April 2015, Antalya, Turkey.

23.Pistekova, V., Hovorka, M., Vecerek, V., Strakova, E. and Suchy, P. 2006. The quality comparison of eggs laid by laying hens kept in battery cages and in a deep litter system. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 51(7): 318-325.

24.Singh, R., Cheng, K.M. and Silversides, F.G. 2009. Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. Poult. Sci., 88(2): 256-264.

25.Sosnowka-Czajka, E., Herbut, E. and Skomorucha, I. 2010. Effect of different housing systems on productivity and welfare of laying hens. Ann. Anim. Sci., 10(4): 349-360.

26.Tauson, R., Wahlstrom, A. and Abrahamsson, P. 1999. Effect of two floor housing systems and cages on health, production, and fear response in layers. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 8(2): 152- 159.

27.Tumova, E. and Ebeid, T. 2003. Effect of housing system on performance and egg quality characteristics in laying hens. Sci. Agric. Boh., 34: 73-80.

28.Tumova, E. and Ebeid, T. 2005. Effect of time of oviposition on egg quality characteristics in cages and in a litter housing system. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50: 129-134.

29.Tumova, E., Skrivan, M., Englmaierova, M. and Zita, L. 2009. The effect of genotype, housing system and egg collection time on egg quality in egg type hens. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 54: 17-23.

30.Tumova, E., Englmaierova, M., Ledvinka, Z. and Charvatova, V. 2011. Interaction between housing system and genotype in relation to internal and external egg quality parameters. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 56: 490-498.

31.Voslarova, E., Hanzalek, Z., Vecerek, V., Strakova, E. and Suchy, P. 2006. Comparison between laying hen performance in the cage system and the deep litter system on a diet free from animal protein. Acta. Vet. Brno., 75(2): 219-225.